Aid In Easier Execution Is Just Not

(Judge LG Dortmund 2 S 39/10 and AG Stuttgart 14 C-6415/06) The judgments on the subject of “Aid in easier execution”, as you among other things the Continentale insurance rates (including GS1, GS2 plus, comfort and economy and some aid tariffs like the BT1) used to pile up. The opinion of the insurer is not supported here always more often by the Court. In the basic tenor, the judges seem to be very United. The phrase “simple version” just does not necessarily means “most cost effective supply”. Under most conditions Goop London, United Kingdom-uk would agree. However, the said statement in terms of insurance let’s look first at once. There we will find (here, for example in the collective COMFORT too in the GA1 or GS2 / plus) following statement: 7 tools tools are technical means or prostheses (no dentures), which should immediately reduce disability, sickness or accident, or compensate for, except Visual AIDS, medical devices, and other sanitary or medical supplies. The costs for AIDS are refundable in simple execution. Subject of dispute between the policyholder and the insured person is here the small, inconspicuous word “easier”.

It now says it will be refunded the prescribed remedy, which must be just as cheap as possible bought? It is perhaps there will be a prosthesis for example, but the cheapest / easiest way or is it even “simple design” in the sense of “only once”? The last opinion was (AZ. 14 C-6415/06) and the subsequent Berufsungsverfahrens on the LG Stuttgart under other subject to the procedure of the AG of Stuttgart. It was, like in the other sentence (download: AZ 2 S 39/10 of the LG Dortmund) performances, which did not provide the Continentale KV or reduced. In the Dortmund procedure, there was a hearing aid and thus related (multi -) cost of approx. EUR 700, in other proceedings Stuttgart there were already more than 4,000 EUR dispute for a prosthesis.