In contrast, they can and must walk together. The free thinker also has the right to change its points of view. In mine in case that, for example, always I had a point of view center-left politician, in special for the formation that I had in the pertaining to school and university period, and even though for my contacts done pastorais while pastoral agent of the Church Catholic that I was for much time. However, of times for deepening my studies in politics here, after, history and philosophy, vi that the proposal leftist, on to the socialism, is imperfection, and defends, not for glamour, but for certainties established politics (and who to read other texts mine will see my reasons), that optimum system of government for Brazil would be the Parlamentarista Monarchy. All my written opinions, positionings and texts, I repeat, are fruit of reflections that I was having throughout the life, without nothing it had me been tax. In contrast, if I had followed strict the dogmas that me had been taxes, I I would have been kardecista, republican and leftist, being these opposing positions total to which I freely hugged, after to think detidamente on such positions and its options. Then, because I only opted in being Catholic, Monarquista and Conservador, I left I of being a free thinker? I believe, for example, that determination papas must be obeyed by catholics, not ' ' because sim' ' , but for deeper reasons, amongst which the religious unit of the entity Church, of which a trustworthy source of the message sent for Christ elapses (the Teaching), that for its turn it displayed ways to live in fullness in this world. Exactly that not concordant I with something, the principle, know that in definitive situations my point of view will not be optimum for my practical experience, therefore I do not only become related with me and living creature in society.